Council’s forestry approach Debate

Environmental Benefits - Ecosystems & Biodiversity

Option 2

Residents strongly support Option 2 due to its potential to enhance biodiversity, stabilize ecosystems, and improve environmental health by transitioning from commercial pine forestry to a continuous canopy of mixed species. They highlight the detrimental effects of current forestry practices, such as erosion, sedimentation, and reduced biodiversity, and emphasize the long-term ecological and recreational benefits of native and mixed-species forests. Many comments also suggest that this approach would better protect waterways, support native wildlife, and provide a more sustainable and visually appealing landscape for future generations.

Table of comments:

Point No	Comment
15.2	A perprtual canopy forest will be valuable protection against erosion due to flooding, slowing the water run-off.Clear felling forest on steep country causes a large part of the erosion we see in the estuary.I support the vison to move from a Clear-felling op, to a perpetual Canopy forest.
25.3	This decision sets the example for LGNZ to commit to long term planning based on sound reasoning and economic assessment. Although it might take the first 20 years to show any tangible benefit, they will become obvious for the 20-100 years, so well done. Council assets like the Sanctuary appreciate the decision made to possibly forfeit marginal returns in the short term in exchange for major biodiversity benefits that will flow from the medium and long term
54.3	Please plant heaps more natives and restore Repo (wetland) areas, create native pathways across the region for birds.
54.3	Please plant heaps more natives and restore Repo (wetland) areas, create native pathways across the region for birds.
67.2	Meanwhile, no new forestry plantings and removal of all Council wildings pines and similar within say 20m of all permanent waterways.
72.3	My strong preference is for option two. Nelson has an extraordinary outdoor adventure offering and transitioning those commercial forests (particularly those that are bordering existing popular areas like Sharlands, the Brook and the Maitai) would boost that offering for locals and tourists alike with a generational opportunity to develop a more ecologically diverse environment. The environmental issues associated with mono-crop forests are well known and I'm sure will be known to the Council.  The hills above Richmond are a highly visible example: exposed rocky hills growing little other than weeds and constantly erosion during rain. I feel strongly that the current commercial forestry approach in Nelson is not a worthwhile use of the currently-forrested land.
72.3	My strong preference is for option two. Nelson has an extraordinary outdoor adventure offering and transitioning those commercial forests (particularly those that are bordering existing popular areas like Sharlands, the Brook and the Maitai) would boost that offering for locals and tourists alike with a generational opportunity to develop a more ecologically diverse environment. The environmental issues associated with mono-crop forests are well known and I'm sure will be known to the Council.  The hills above Richmond are a highly visible example: exposed rocky hills growing little other than weeds and constantly erosion during rain. I feel strongly that the current commercial forestry approach in Nelson is not a worthwhile use of the currently-forrested land.
76.1	Exit commercial forestry on public lands and use it to grow native trees, species.
78.1	I have just enjoyed reading Our Nelson To Tatou Whakatu.  We moved up to Whakatu 5 years ago, from Cashmere, Otautahi, from a 5 bedroom house to a Lockwood 2013 with 3 bedrooms.  Anyway, here is my submission: After planting native bushes and small trees, we have noticed a resurgence of native birds, such as Tuis, Kerero, Piwakas, Ruru, and others. Hence, I feel strongly that the 2nd Option,  would be the best way to go. Thankyou.
81.3	Native fauna needs to be reinstated if possible.
89.3	I would prefer a continuous canopy of native-only species, noting that I understand this would likely mean that no selective logging would be able to take place.
108.3	Strongly support this
119.3	I believe there are many reasons why this is the correct approach for Nelson. The restoration of native forest would help reduce biodiversity loss, sequester carbon (which is absolutely urgently required as one essential strategy to slow clinate change), provide a natural visual backdrop to more parts of Nelson ( the aesthetics of which would benefit tourism), provide healthier recreational opportunities, improve soils and reduce slip danger (which is an obvious major concern with increasingly more extreme weather events).There is the possibility of revenue from recreational us of the restored native forests by tourists.
120.3	I support the transition to permanent indigenous forests
190.3	This just has to be done. There is no doubt that on the steep slopes where most of NCC forestry is, the damage done by repeated clear felling of pine is simply not acceptable. Coupled with the favoured mechanised harvest approach (which dramatically worsens surface damage) soil stripping and the impact on the whenua and by close extension, the Tasman Bay moana just can't be tolerated any longer.Having hands on experience with Silvan Forest retiring their pine and replanting with a (non-harvestable) native/exotic mix, and also TDC's similar approach with Kingsland Forest, NCC following suit and doing the same should now be a given. If this costs NCC then so be it - this is the price of doing the right thing, and probably the price of making poor decisions to be involved in this space in the first place. Without a Forest Manager on staff to handle this properly, NCC hasn't done itself any favours at all. Consider Silvan and Kingsland as the template for how this can be done.There are suitable and appropriate places for harvestable pine plantations - Nelson's steep slopes coupled with their close proximity to waterways and Tasman Bay are not it.
206.3	Poor use of the land which benefits overseas companies and only creates a few local jobs. It also degrades the environment causing slips and damage when the trees are harvested and the run off of all the soil when its loosened, the bay is covered in deposits from this which have killed most of the marine life and significantly reduced the quality of the bay.
231.1	For all of the reasons that Council has already noted, moving away from commercial forestry and re-planting with mixed species indigenous forest will greatly benefit the environment. Fresh water quality and biodiversity will both improve under indigenous forest. Having indigenous forest in our recreational spaces also improves experience for users and is closer to what naturally would have been here before human settlement.
255.3	Modern Forestry practices leave lots of debris and this ends up washing down stream and into the sea. Commercial conifer forests are ecologically poor and do not support diverse species.
255.3	Modern Forestry practices leave lots of debris and this ends up washing down stream and into the sea. Commercial conifer forests are ecologically poor and do not support diverse species.
275.3	i would like to see a more environmentally minded shift away from forestry.  This would create a more biodiverse environment,  allow for the halo effect of the brook sanctuary to take off and reduce fire risks etc in the summer..i would like to see this shift still allowing for recreational access- and infact improve recreational access to these areas- mountain biking could be improved as the trails wouldnt be damaged and closed intermittently due to forestry works and it potentially become a real draw for mountain biking tourism to the region
291.3	The proximity of greenspace to the CBD is an awesome feature of Nelson. Given the impact of clear feeling forest at harvest time on waterways and the ecological benefits of maintaining a continuous canopy I think it's any obvious choice to reture land from commercial forestry to support biodiversity and recreational values
413.3	we need to rewild nz asap
417.3	I strongly support the Council exiting from comercial pine forestry in favour of a continuous canopy of mixed species, including natives and high-value hardwoods.
441.3	NC should exit commercial forestry asap, and dramatically enhance it's planting of natives.
459.1	There are several compelling reasons to allow the Maitai Valley to revert to native forest. First, commercial logging on steep hills is bound to cause erosion, adversely effecting the river's health. Also it is good for biodiversity - we need as broad a range of species, eg pollinating insects, as possible. And as an active beekeeper, I'm mindful that the original species, largely manuka and kanuka, are a source of high-value honey.
464.3	Try to plant more native as possible!
497.3	Grow a range of forestry type to benefit the community incluidng: biodeiversity, food, carbon seqiestration and stabisliation of slopes. Do not get stucck in the binary thinking indigenous good non-indigenous bad. Decisions should be based on ecosystem and comunity benefits across the range of areas, slopes, land types and topography….
497.3	Grow a range of forestry type to benefit the community incluidng: biodeiversity, food, carbon seqiestration and stabisliation of slopes. Do not get stucck in the binary thinking indigenous good non-indigenous bad. Decisions should be based on ecosystem and comunity benefits across the range of areas, slopes, land types and topography….
534.2	Support the council's proposed approach. The current extent of, and approach to, commercial forestry is an environmental travesty. It would be fantastic to see the council lead a transition to predominantly native forests. Native forests wield improved biodiversity, landscape, and possible carbon value (pending changes to ETS). They also wield economic value through supporting recreational opportunities, building resilience and reducing risk on property and environment associated with fire and extreme weather events, improving nearby property values, and supporting product markets like rongoā. I support the recommendations in the Right Tree Right Place Taskforce Report. The transition should happen at pace, starting with currently bare harvested land. I question the assumption of expense and long-term loss of income. Accounting should consider the current (not easily monetised) cost of commercial forestry on society and the environment. It should also capture the full range of benefits (economic and otherwise) of a predominantly native forest canopy. Council should lead the way. It would be fantastic to see the LTP acknowledge the role of council in supporting private/iwi/other commercial forestry enterprises in transitioning to improved land use.
659.3	Long term I feel this would improve the biodiversity and soil stability and health of our forests.See also additional comments regarding Mountain Biking.
674.3	We should not allow a clear felling approach to forestry in the Maitai Valley.  Leaving the slopes of the Maitai river clear of trees would certainly have worsened the flooding in 2022 due to increased water levels and debris.  The clear felling of forests is also contributing to silt deposits in the haven and Tasman Bay, impacting wildlife.
683.1	I support Council being examples of good environmental stewardship and exiting forestry that relies on clear felling harvest. It also leads to recreational gains and more beauty and diversity in our local environment
751.3	The saying "now we know better, we need to do better" comes to mind. The impact of forestry erosion on Tasman Bay is well documented.... just stop!
773.3	Native forests, biodiversity and non-motorized recreation have way more value to our environment, economy and resiliency of our city than pine logs do.
784.3	This approach would support council commitments in other areas (Nelson Biodiversity Strategy, etc.).  It would also protect our natural freshwater services, as well as marine restoration by reducing sedimentation in our waterways.
784.3	This approach would support council commitments in other areas (Nelson Biodiversity Strategy, etc.).  It would also protect our natural freshwater services, as well as marine restoration by reducing sedimentation in our waterways.
785.3	Commercial forestry creates monocultures and pine tree farms not native, biodiverse forests. Wildlife and the environment will benefit from adding more native and mixed species. In addition, silt will be reduces and our waters will be cleaner and land more resilient to flooding, storms, and climate change which is continually getting worse. If you chose to exit out of forestry, this can have monumental impacts for future generations that will be so grateful in the long-term.
807.3	Commercial forestry on our Nelson hills is ridiculous and an enormous strain on our environment. 1: Monteray pines and Douglas fir forests are vectors for environmental weeds like pampas and old man's beard. These invade natural places like the Maitai and degrade the habitat. Additionally the pine species themselves become weeds.2: siltation, slips and nutrient run off degrades our freshwater ecosystems, landscapes and ocean ecosystems. Silt has major effects on bivalves, seaweeds and biodiverse habitats on the coast. Revegetating pine forests with native vegetation will also allow native coastal ecosystems to recover. Native fish species will also benefit.3: Native forest will be better for carbon sequestration, biodiversity and aesthetics. Forestry does not sequester carbon as well as forever native forests. Biodiversity can be enhanced by creating habitat for endangered birds, plants, lizards and snails that are unique to nelson. The belt of forestry is an eye sore, with horrific scars left by erosion and open felled sections.4: forestry poses a fire risk to biodiverse areas as well as being a danger to people.I ask that you consider the populations of brown creepers that live in forestry sections around marsden valley that may become extirpated by felling. Explore ways to mitigate this damage. I do not wish that this land be reused for housing or farming or other developments, but to be revegetated with native plants and maintained to avoid them becoming weedy or overrun with browsing pests.
807.3	Commercial forestry on our Nelson hills is ridiculous and an enormous strain on our environment. 1: Monteray pines and Douglas fir forests are vectors for environmental weeds like pampas and old man's beard. These invade natural places like the Maitai and degrade the habitat. Additionally the pine species themselves become weeds.2: siltation, slips and nutrient run off degrades our freshwater ecosystems, landscapes and ocean ecosystems. Silt has major effects on bivalves, seaweeds and biodiverse habitats on the coast. Revegetating pine forests with native vegetation will also allow native coastal ecosystems to recover. Native fish species will also benefit.3: Native forest will be better for carbon sequestration, biodiversity and aesthetics. Forestry does not sequester carbon as well as forever native forests. Biodiversity can be enhanced by creating habitat for endangered birds, plants, lizards and snails that are unique to nelson. The belt of forestry is an eye sore, with horrific scars left by erosion and open felled sections.4: forestry poses a fire risk to biodiverse areas as well as being a danger to people.I ask that you consider the populations of brown creepers that live in forestry sections around marsden valley that may become extirpated by felling. Explore ways to mitigate this damage. I do not wish that this land be reused for housing or farming or other developments, but to be revegetated with native plants and maintained to avoid them becoming weedy or overrun with browsing pests.
835.1	You have asked for a public endorsement of the proposal to move away from Radiata and towards a continuous canopy of mixed species. I fully support this approach.I consider it a priority that the areas which are currently bare (having been harvested) should be replanted in appropriate, permanent, native tress as soon as is practicable. A repeat of the August 2022 rain event is inevitable, and thoughtful planting now could serve to reduce the flood damage downstream.In the medium and longer term, there is considerable benefit in a continuous canopy from both an ecological and a water management point-of-view.Although you have suggested that Nelson could claim some kudos as a leader in future-focused land management, we actually have much to learn from other cities that have already moved in this direction.  In particular, I am thinking of Rotorua, where the forest close to the city is managed primarily for recreation and the city is now a "mountain bike magnet" for the whole North Island. (You could research the estimated economic benefit that bikers bring to the city.) Similarly, Wellington manages its' forest primarily for water and allows recreation.  Both examples show that trees can have much more value when left standing than when harvested.I am not sure if you will have considered all of the implications of the proposed change of approach - for example the control of invasive pests (rodents, mustelids etc) in bush areas around the city typically falls to small informal groups of volunteers. I am involved with one in the Maitai. If, over time, we are to see an expansion of the area covered in mixed, diverse forest species, we can also expect to see an expansion of the range and number of pests.   The Council could look to increase the support and funding that it offers to groups involved in pest control, and I suggest that The Council also has a role in publicly acknowledging the work of these volunteers and in encouraging others to join in with the work.
851.3	I am very glad that Council has done a review of the whole of forestry.  Although it is more expensive yes it makes sense to consider not just the $600 ha of pine but to consider all forests as a whole in terms of management of pests etc. I'm personally not quite sure how the mixed canopy would compare ecologically to a fully indigenous canopy, but I defer to the taskforce experts and support their recommendations.  It is for the greater long term good environmentally etc to move away from just continuous pine forestry so I am in support. Good job.
878.1	I agree with the eventual replacement of Council-owned pine forests with permanent native forests.However, in preparation for this, I request that a targetted effort be made to reduce and finallyeliminate old mans beard from the city, including from private land. I recall a budget item for thispurpose some years ago but no appreciable result was achieved probably because the effort was notsustained. Understand that you need to go back again and again to treat major infestations of thispest which is flourishing all over the place. Seeds will be flying and colonising all the spaces youare trying to revegetate unless a determined and sustained effort is made. Please include a budgetitem for this specific purpose spread over at least five years.
884.3	The more species the healthier our environment!
886.3	Save the wildlife and the native trees!
894.3	Yes, support reindigenising our forests and moving away from pine forestry to native high value forest, it would be best in my opinion to plant natives only or possibly very well researched exotics amongst natives if the experts want that but ideally natives especially on steeper areas and maybe food producing exotics/fruit trees in high use public or designated forgaing areas makes sense to me. Also ensure the changeover of tree types is done bit by bit to avoid higher cost flood or slip events
899.1	Through an extensive process over the past 15 months, the Kotahitanga mō te Taiao Alliance agreed upon a Strategy Implementation Pathway Plan.  A 2 page summary document is attached to this submission.  Key issues were identified through that process that impact upon the natural environment, including our lands, waterways and surrounding seas.  Sedimentation featured very highly as one of the most significant aggravating factors, one that not only impacted our land ecosystems, but is also driving the loss of and potential for restoration of abundant shellfish communities in the Bay.  Another issue that arose was the need to transition to improved permanent forest cover for a multiplicity of reasons, including reducing the loss of soil, improved carbon sequestration, improved riparian and coastal margins, improved biodiversity, floodplain and corridor connectivity.  The Right Tree, Right Place taskforce gave a thorough and concerted consideration of the issues, inviting a significant number of community members (with expertise and/or other knowledges) to contribute to the process.  The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is currently working on a programme to improve opportunities for transitioning away from pine plantation forestry where there are obvious benefits from doing so.  As TNC has an MOU with the KMTT Alliance (of which NCC is a signatory), there is an opportunity for us to work collaboratively to help identify opportunities, e.g. exploring alternative income streams; and other potential sustainable finance mechanisms.  We are currently engaging with Council staff in discussions on how to carry this forward.  TNC Global has provided funding to KMTT for a Reforestation Accelerator Initiative with similar values to the work of the Right Tree, Right Place taskforce/NCC outputs.  We are working on a number of initiatives to help accelerate reforestation, including developing mapping tools, and looking at both financial and non-financial incentives.  We are working closely with international teams to consider business models and ways of working to reduce costs.  We look forward to working collaboratively where opportunities allow to progress this thoughtful initiative of Council.
923.3	We don't need as many commercial forestry operations as we currently have. Yes we need houses but we are not producing only what is necessary. Our forestry industry is profiting off selling wood to other countries at the cost of our land and rivers. This also drives up the cost of Domestic product. the Tasman Bay area is also prone to erosion from the 30% reduced ground water that is caused by pine forest followed by the heavy rains. I propose that we put more emphasis on native forests and trails so that our tourism industry can get back to it's glory days and become our Primary Industry.
925.3	More emphasis on planting natives please
926.3	The inclusion of exotic (not native) species in the replanting should be avoided. Using exotic plants in the replanting will not only look ugly but will lead to spread of non native plants into neighbouring areas and future costs in removing them.
932.3	I wholeheartedly support the transition from commercial forestry to replanting the 600 hectares of council-owned land with a continuous canopy of mixed native species. This decision would have a profound impact on our region's biodiversity, conservation efforts, and recreational appeal, while also sending a powerful message about our commitment to environmental stewardship.The benefits of mixed native forests for biodiversity and conservation are well-documented. Research has shown that these forests support a significantly higher variety of native flora and fauna compared to commercial monoculture plantations. By providing a diverse range of habitats and food sources, mixed native forests create a haven for endangered species and contribute to the overall health of our ecosystems. Moreover, these forests play a vital role in regulating water cycles, preventing soil erosion, and sequestering carbon, thereby helping to mitigate the effects of climate change.In addition to the ecological benefits, transitioning to mixed native forests would greatly enhance Nelson's appeal as a destination for outdoor recreation and eco-tourism. The natural beauty of these forests, with their diverse canopy and understory, would attract both locals and visitors seeking to immerse themselves in nature. Additionally, it's important to note that the impact of this decision extends far beyond the 600 hectares directly managed by the council. By taking this step, the council would send a resounding message about the value we place on biodiversity and our commitment to preserving our natural heritage. This leadership would inspire private landowners, businesses, and the wider community to follow suit, creating a ripple effect that amplifies the positive impact on our environment. As more stakeholders prioritize the restoration of native habitats, we can create a network of thriving, interconnected ecosystems that support a rich tapestry of life.Further, securing long-term recreational access to forestry tracks and trails is crucial for our community, visitors, and events. Mountain biking alone has the potential to generate $48.8M in direct spend for Nelson Tasman, but current access limitations result in a significant loss of $18.5M. Beyond the immediate economic benefits, ensuring access to these natural assets provides immeasurable value to our residents' quality of life and attracts visitors seeking unique outdoor experiences. The proposed long-term agreement between the Council and Ngāti Koata for access to the Maitai Valley is a vital step towards unlocking the full potential of our region's recreational offerings.
943.3	I definitely support more native tree planting.
1018.3	I am an active MTB rider and part of a weekly volunteer track maintenance team for NMBC.  Observing the amazing work done in Codgers area - the new plantings flourishing and the awesome birdsong.  Compare this to the absolute devastation and destroyed habitat for birdlife of the Sharlands clear felling of pines and also the pollution of creeks and rivers.  The Councils preferred option needs more acceleration before it is too late.A policy of protection of access is also very urgent.Look at what this contributes to the Region.
1034.3	I support the Council's recommendation that they change their practice to grow a continuous canopy of mixed species.  This outcome will help mitigate the effects of severe storms as seen in August 2022 when pine forest slash were washed down the slopes and caused damage. It also will support keeping the hillsides intact from erosion and our declining biodiversity as well as sequestering carbon.  It is the choice for the times.
1039.1	native species
1044.3	Make the maitai Valley, Renamed back to Matai Valley and planted out with more matais
1045.1	Firstly, a big thank you to Council for the decision to undertake a review of its 600ha of plantation forestry holdings. Secondly, congratulations to the Right Tree Right Place Taskforce for the thorough and comprehensive review of the council’s forestry holdings. The information, assessments, observations and preferences contained in the various reports and the well-foundered, evidence-based and wide-ranging recommendations should provide a strong strategic basis for Council to proceed with a staged approach to implementing the taskforce’s recommendations. If the recommendations are adopted and implemented over time with extensive community involvement they should result in profound positive benefits on the management of the City’s eastern hinterland and restoration of indigneous biodiversity values and provide increased recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. This in turn should not only provide personal health and social benefits but also considerable long term financial benefits to the wider community and future generations. Council’s options for forestryIn terms of the two options proposed, I strongly support Option 2 – Council’s proposal to change the current approach through exiting commercial forestry over time and to grow a continuous canopy of mixed species and manage the Council land as one area. Related priorities and considerationsTo enable option 2 to proceed it is crucial to quickly prepare a next steps strategy and to allocate adequate funding in the LTP to address the recommendations in the report requiring immediate action (14 & 15), the transition planning and high priority areas for action (16-19). The need to urgently address current issues with invasive pest animals and plants mentioned in several places in the report and is the focus of recommendation 5, will also need to have adequate funding in all years of the LTP. Otherwise, the current biodiversity degradation will continue to increase and become an even more difficult challenge to get on top of. While supporting the concept of mixed forests and having introduced canopy trees in appropriate areas that maybe harvested at some stage in the future, the location of such areas and the species used need to be carefully considered. I note that the report indicates that the most likely locations for consideration of some continued planting of timber species  is some of the more accessible lower slopes in the Roding, which from my knowledge of the eastern hills I concur with. Such considerations include the impacts of providing ground access to such sites, impacts on waterways and establishment of adequate riparian margins, as well as ensuring that they do not contribute to additional wilding pines or other introduced species becoming future pest plants. I suggest that the ‘independent community entity’ included in recommendation 4 have in addition to tangata whenua also have a wide range of perspectives from the community including those with biodiversity expertise, and perhaps also involvement in the Nelson Biodiversity Forum. I also feel that recommendation 6 could be strengthened through the addition of “and biodiversity” after “climate” and in front of the last word “risks” so that it reads …. “and address climate and biodiversity risks”. As I mention in two paragraphs below it is widely accepted that we have a NZ and global biodiversity crisis (as well as a climate crisis). Other relevant considerationsWhile the report provides some background on previous discussions and reports on the development and impacts of forestry there have been significant changes in community attitudes and values as well as in council over the last 40 years or so that I believe are important for council and those who will be dealing with the implementation of the report to bear in mind. There has been increasing acknowledgement that NZ, and the rest of the world, is facing a biodiversity crisis with the loss of indigenous habitats particularly in lowland areas and the degradation of remaining areas through the spread of introduced browsing animals and the reduction in and loss of our special indigenous fauna. The conservation movement has largely moved from saving areas under threats of destruction to restoration of the biodiversity values over a wide range of habitats.  These concerns and the desire to restore degraded areas was a major driver in the establishment of the Nelson Biodiversity Forum and the resulting Biodiversity Strategies developed jointly by Council, the Department of Conservation and other government agencies along with a wide of concerned community organisations and companies. Many existing organisations, such as Forest and Bird and Friends of the Maitai, took the lead in various restoration projects. It was also the key driver for the establishment of the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust and the creation of a predator-free sanctuary in Council’s former water management reserve in the upper Brook Valley. Many trapping groups have been working hard in areas around the sanctuary and in the corridor down the Brook Valley to reduce the numbers of animal pests, such as stoats, possums, weasels and rats, that were killing large numbers of birds. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary and other conservation projects have shown that there is an “army of conservation volunteers” in our community who are very willing to regularly give their time and energy to enhancing the biodiversity values of our natural areas, including in riparian margins and the often quite rugged eastern hills. Such groups of volunteers have been co-ordinated and assisted by Council over many years now, including in projects under the umbrella of the Council’s Nelson Nature programme. The results from these efforts are now showing up not only when people visit the sanctuary and areas where pest trapping is occurring and supplementary planting is being undertaken, but also in residential areas adjoining the eastern hills with increased sightings of native bird species.     There is no reason why this voluntary army cannot be encouraged and increased to assist with the replanting of areas cleared of exotic forestry in the areas that are to be transitioned to native species. Many retirees are keen to contribute to such projects and many active walkers, runners and mountain bikers are also keen to give back to improve the areas they enjoy visiting and to expanding such areas. It may be useful for those planning the transition from exotic to native species to review the work that the Nelson Biodiversity Forum has undertaken, including the large-scale mapping of potential biodiversity corridors designed to link upland areas with lowland and coastal areas, to see how such retired forestry areas can be incorporated into and enhance such biodiversity corridors. It is pleasing to see that the taskforce report acknowledges that much of the forestry blocks in the Maitai, Marsden and Brook catchments are within the Nelson Nature Halo project around the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary. And in addition that the report contains observations and preferences that they be phased over to indigenous vegetation and provide increased habitat enhancement for birdlife from the sanctuary and additional opportunities for increased recreational activities close to urban areas. This fits very nicely with the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary vision of a biodiversity corridor down the Brook Valley and of improving the habitat outside of the predator-proof fence to enable wildlife that fly over or are relocated outside the fence to have a greater chance of successfully repopulating the adjacent areas of native forests. As a former member of the Forestry Committee during my second term as a councillor, I advocated for a wider range of plantation species, including macrocarpa and hardwood species, to provide a range of timbers that could provide a resource for local furniture and cabinet makers and other possible users of alternative species. However, the prevailing view at the time was that Council needed to focus on increasing the area of Council’s “commercial” exotic forestry plantations to a so-called “sustainable” area of 800ha and continue planting Pinus radiata (as that was what everybody else was planting). This situation was not entirely surprising as the chair of the committee then was the recently retired former NZ Forest Service Conservator of Forests for the Nelson Marlborough area. One of the consequences of this desire to increase the area in plantation forestry was the establishment of some areas of pine plantations in small isolated pockets (particularly in the Maitai catchment) with seemingly no consideration of how the trees would be harvested 25-30 years later and the potential adverse impacts from providing access tracks and the logging techniques on water and soil values. Pines were also planted upstream of Council’s Maitai water supply dam and intakes contrary to its own water supply catchment management practice and the generally accepted best practice throughout the country. So it is very pleasing to read in the taskforce report that such plantings are likely to be transitioned to natives and environmentally damaging practices of clear felling of quite large areas will cease. In 2009, as Chair of Council’s Environment Committee I reworked a discussion paper following encouragement from Mayor Marshall on revegetating the city’s hill backdrop and valleys and establishing corridors which built on a paper initially prepared six years earlier. It seemed to help with the Council purchase of additional land on the Grampians, Brook Valley and the ridge in between the Brook and Maitai valleys that contained the former Dun Mountain railway line that is now part of the popular Coppermine Trail – one of the 23 Great Rides of New Zealand. It was however rather disappointing to see that after the pines were harvested that it was mostly replanted in another crop of pines. The paper is included below for anyone who is interested in reading it. 28 April 2009 The Chairperson and CouncillorsEnvironment Committee VEGETATING THE CITY HILL BACKDROP AND VALLEYS AND ESTABLISHING CORRIDORS Reason for the PaperTo suggest the preparation of a strategy for the re-vegetation of the city’s backdrop hills and valleys and the establishment of multi-purpose corridors. BackgroundOver the past decade or so, Council has been actively re-vegetating some of the hills that form the backdrop to the central city with native and other appropriate species. Areas on the Grampians, Centre of NZ and the Malvern Hills have been particularly targeted. Various individuals and community groups have assisted with this work. A network of tracks which have been popular with walkers, runners and mountain bikers has been established as part of the provision of recreational facilities available to residents and visitors. The western slopes of the Malvern Hills were purchased by Council with the express purpose of securing the backdrop to the CBD and Wood in public ownership. The planting of native species has been happening progressively. A well-used track has been provided, linking the Centre of NZ with Walter’s Bluff. Council now owns the majority of the Grampians, including a valuable native forest remnant on the southern slopes and has been replacing the pine and eucalyptus species with more appropriate ornamental exotic species and natives. The public reaction to the choice of exotic ornamentals indicated that there is considerable support for re-vegetating our hills with native species.  In the Marsden Valley, a combined programme with Council, schools and the community has been controlling old man’s beard and other weed pests and planting additional native trees in the reserve areas. Additional tracks are planned to cater for walkers, runners and mountain bikers, including providing further access to the Bryant Range. Over the past 30 years, Council has been actively acquiring land in the Maitai Valley and establishing a variety of recreational facilities, including the Maitai Walkway and Waahi Taakaro golf course. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust has been established and is working on implementing its vision for a fenced pest-free sanctuary in the forested headwaters of the Brook catchment where lost species, such as kiwi, saddleback and tuatara, will be able to be re-introduced. It is anticipated that the sanctuary will be a nursery for wildlife that will spread into the adjoining forested areas such as the Maitai Valley, Marsden Valley, Mount Richmond Forest Park and down the Brook Valley corridor into the central city. In August 2003, the Council and the Department of Conservation jointly published the booklet Living Heritage: Growing Native Plants in Nelson which describes eight different lowland ecosystems in the Nelson City area and provides advice on planting and lists of native species appropriate for each ecosystem. This publication is an excellent resource for residents, community groups and others interested in restoring the native vegetation that is unique to Nelson. In May 2007, Council adopted the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy after a collaborative preparation effort by a Council-led inter-agency working group involving more than 20 community organisation over the preceding 2 years, including wider public consultation. The strategy contains 8 principles for biodiversity management, a vision, goals, objectives, methods and priority actions, including the preparation of Biodiversity Action Plans to cover flats, freshwater, coast, sea and hills. The Biodiversity Forum at its most recent meeting on 30 March 2009 adopted 3 action plans for the terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. It is now a widely accepted principle in biodiversity and conservation reserve management that connected areas are better than unconnected areas and that larger reserves are better than smaller reserves and as a consequence the benefits of connecting reserve areas via wildlife corridors are now widely appreciated. Such corridors are general vegetated to at least some extent to enable the movement of wildlife, particularly birds, in relatively safety and with food sources along the way to help sustain them in journeys between larger areas of suitable habitat. In urban and peri-urban situations such corridors can be for multiple purposes eg they can contain tracks and other facilities for recreational users. In valleys, such corridors can also incorporate esplanade/riparian reserves/strips alongside rivers and streams. The Nelson Biodiversity Strategy included several references to this concept such as Priority Action 16. Connect large and small remnants of native vegetation where appropriate with corridors of replanting, focusing these along the course of streams and rivers and across the city. The VisionTo develop a strategy or policy that has a goals of vegetating with appropriate native and other species, the city backdrop and adjacent valleys and establishes multi-purpose corridors that help to achieve the biodiversity strategy and bring nature back into the urban areas.Preparation of a Re-vegetation and Corridor StrategySuch a strategy could build on what Council has been doing over recent years and provide a more integrated, considered and strategic approach then the present rather ad hoc approach. It could identify backdrop hills and valleys that could be re-vegetated with native and appropriate exotic species. It could also identify possible corridors to link areas of native vegetation. These could be mapped onto large scale aerial photographs. The strategy could in addition to covering land currently owned by Council also include other public lands, land protected by covenants and land that has significant conservation value or potential strategic and/or conservation value that Council or other public agencies may wish to acquire and/or protect. Priorities could be established to help determine Council work programmes, guide community planting projects and reserve acquisition. Council could involve other interested parties including the Biodiversity Forum and provide opportunities for public input. Such a strategy may provide reserve network information that could eventually be incorporated in the Nelson Resource Management Plan, perhaps via structure plans, and into other Council documents such as reserve management plans. BenefitsThese could include:Biodiversity – assisting with implementation of the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy -  enhanced natural values through additional areas of native vegetation and network of wildlife corridors;Community involvement and pride – huge potential to involve the community and to tap into the enthusiasm for planting native trees and shrubs and predator control projects – participants deriving personal satisfaction and community pride from their involvement and the work achieved;Recreation and healthy lifestyle – additional recreational opportunities;Nelson naturally brand – another clean & green element - enhanced backdrop to city and corridor network – a point of difference with other communities;Tourism – additional attractions and facilities for visitors;Employment and training – opportunities for pest control, plant propagation, planting, track development etc;Reduced fire risk – buffer between inflammable vegetation and city;Buffer between people and pollen from pines;Increased certainty with respect to long term planning goals;Substantial contribution to Council’s vision and community outcomes; andPossible opportunities for obtaining carbon credits for re-vegetated and enhanced areas. Recommendation That the Environment Committee consider this paper and, if supportive, set up a joint councillor and staff working group to prepare a draft re-vegetation and corridor strategy.  Derek Shaw
1045.1	Firstly, a big thank you to Council for the decision to undertake a review of its 600ha of plantation forestry holdings. Secondly, congratulations to the Right Tree Right Place Taskforce for the thorough and comprehensive review of the council’s forestry holdings. The information, assessments, observations and preferences contained in the various reports and the well-foundered, evidence-based and wide-ranging recommendations should provide a strong strategic basis for Council to proceed with a staged approach to implementing the taskforce’s recommendations. If the recommendations are adopted and implemented over time with extensive community involvement they should result in profound positive benefits on the management of the City’s eastern hinterland and restoration of indigneous biodiversity values and provide increased recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. This in turn should not only provide personal health and social benefits but also considerable long term financial benefits to the wider community and future generations. Council’s options for forestryIn terms of the two options proposed, I strongly support Option 2 – Council’s proposal to change the current approach through exiting commercial forestry over time and to grow a continuous canopy of mixed species and manage the Council land as one area. Related priorities and considerationsTo enable option 2 to proceed it is crucial to quickly prepare a next steps strategy and to allocate adequate funding in the LTP to address the recommendations in the report requiring immediate action (14 & 15), the transition planning and high priority areas for action (16-19). The need to urgently address current issues with invasive pest animals and plants mentioned in several places in the report and is the focus of recommendation 5, will also need to have adequate funding in all years of the LTP. Otherwise, the current biodiversity degradation will continue to increase and become an even more difficult challenge to get on top of. While supporting the concept of mixed forests and having introduced canopy trees in appropriate areas that maybe harvested at some stage in the future, the location of such areas and the species used need to be carefully considered. I note that the report indicates that the most likely locations for consideration of some continued planting of timber species  is some of the more accessible lower slopes in the Roding, which from my knowledge of the eastern hills I concur with. Such considerations include the impacts of providing ground access to such sites, impacts on waterways and establishment of adequate riparian margins, as well as ensuring that they do not contribute to additional wilding pines or other introduced species becoming future pest plants. I suggest that the ‘independent community entity’ included in recommendation 4 have in addition to tangata whenua also have a wide range of perspectives from the community including those with biodiversity expertise, and perhaps also involvement in the Nelson Biodiversity Forum. I also feel that recommendation 6 could be strengthened through the addition of “and biodiversity” after “climate” and in front of the last word “risks” so that it reads …. “and address climate and biodiversity risks”. As I mention in two paragraphs below it is widely accepted that we have a NZ and global biodiversity crisis (as well as a climate crisis). Other relevant considerationsWhile the report provides some background on previous discussions and reports on the development and impacts of forestry there have been significant changes in community attitudes and values as well as in council over the last 40 years or so that I believe are important for council and those who will be dealing with the implementation of the report to bear in mind. There has been increasing acknowledgement that NZ, and the rest of the world, is facing a biodiversity crisis with the loss of indigenous habitats particularly in lowland areas and the degradation of remaining areas through the spread of introduced browsing animals and the reduction in and loss of our special indigenous fauna. The conservation movement has largely moved from saving areas under threats of destruction to restoration of the biodiversity values over a wide range of habitats.  These concerns and the desire to restore degraded areas was a major driver in the establishment of the Nelson Biodiversity Forum and the resulting Biodiversity Strategies developed jointly by Council, the Department of Conservation and other government agencies along with a wide of concerned community organisations and companies. Many existing organisations, such as Forest and Bird and Friends of the Maitai, took the lead in various restoration projects. It was also the key driver for the establishment of the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust and the creation of a predator-free sanctuary in Council’s former water management reserve in the upper Brook Valley. Many trapping groups have been working hard in areas around the sanctuary and in the corridor down the Brook Valley to reduce the numbers of animal pests, such as stoats, possums, weasels and rats, that were killing large numbers of birds. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary and other conservation projects have shown that there is an “army of conservation volunteers” in our community who are very willing to regularly give their time and energy to enhancing the biodiversity values of our natural areas, including in riparian margins and the often quite rugged eastern hills. Such groups of volunteers have been co-ordinated and assisted by Council over many years now, including in projects under the umbrella of the Council’s Nelson Nature programme. The results from these efforts are now showing up not only when people visit the sanctuary and areas where pest trapping is occurring and supplementary planting is being undertaken, but also in residential areas adjoining the eastern hills with increased sightings of native bird species.     There is no reason why this voluntary army cannot be encouraged and increased to assist with the replanting of areas cleared of exotic forestry in the areas that are to be transitioned to native species. Many retirees are keen to contribute to such projects and many active walkers, runners and mountain bikers are also keen to give back to improve the areas they enjoy visiting and to expanding such areas. It may be useful for those planning the transition from exotic to native species to review the work that the Nelson Biodiversity Forum has undertaken, including the large-scale mapping of potential biodiversity corridors designed to link upland areas with lowland and coastal areas, to see how such retired forestry areas can be incorporated into and enhance such biodiversity corridors. It is pleasing to see that the taskforce report acknowledges that much of the forestry blocks in the Maitai, Marsden and Brook catchments are within the Nelson Nature Halo project around the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary. And in addition that the report contains observations and preferences that they be phased over to indigenous vegetation and provide increased habitat enhancement for birdlife from the sanctuary and additional opportunities for increased recreational activities close to urban areas. This fits very nicely with the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary vision of a biodiversity corridor down the Brook Valley and of improving the habitat outside of the predator-proof fence to enable wildlife that fly over or are relocated outside the fence to have a greater chance of successfully repopulating the adjacent areas of native forests. As a former member of the Forestry Committee during my second term as a councillor, I advocated for a wider range of plantation species, including macrocarpa and hardwood species, to provide a range of timbers that could provide a resource for local furniture and cabinet makers and other possible users of alternative species. However, the prevailing view at the time was that Council needed to focus on increasing the area of Council’s “commercial” exotic forestry plantations to a so-called “sustainable” area of 800ha and continue planting Pinus radiata (as that was what everybody else was planting). This situation was not entirely surprising as the chair of the committee then was the recently retired former NZ Forest Service Conservator of Forests for the Nelson Marlborough area. One of the consequences of this desire to increase the area in plantation forestry was the establishment of some areas of pine plantations in small isolated pockets (particularly in the Maitai catchment) with seemingly no consideration of how the trees would be harvested 25-30 years later and the potential adverse impacts from providing access tracks and the logging techniques on water and soil values. Pines were also planted upstream of Council’s Maitai water supply dam and intakes contrary to its own water supply catchment management practice and the generally accepted best practice throughout the country. So it is very pleasing to read in the taskforce report that such plantings are likely to be transitioned to natives and environmentally damaging practices of clear felling of quite large areas will cease. In 2009, as Chair of Council’s Environment Committee I reworked a discussion paper following encouragement from Mayor Marshall on revegetating the city’s hill backdrop and valleys and establishing corridors which built on a paper initially prepared six years earlier. It seemed to help with the Council purchase of additional land on the Grampians, Brook Valley and the ridge in between the Brook and Maitai valleys that contained the former Dun Mountain railway line that is now part of the popular Coppermine Trail – one of the 23 Great Rides of New Zealand. It was however rather disappointing to see that after the pines were harvested that it was mostly replanted in another crop of pines. The paper is included below for anyone who is interested in reading it. 28 April 2009 The Chairperson and CouncillorsEnvironment Committee VEGETATING THE CITY HILL BACKDROP AND VALLEYS AND ESTABLISHING CORRIDORS Reason for the PaperTo suggest the preparation of a strategy for the re-vegetation of the city’s backdrop hills and valleys and the establishment of multi-purpose corridors. BackgroundOver the past decade or so, Council has been actively re-vegetating some of the hills that form the backdrop to the central city with native and other appropriate species. Areas on the Grampians, Centre of NZ and the Malvern Hills have been particularly targeted. Various individuals and community groups have assisted with this work. A network of tracks which have been popular with walkers, runners and mountain bikers has been established as part of the provision of recreational facilities available to residents and visitors. The western slopes of the Malvern Hills were purchased by Council with the express purpose of securing the backdrop to the CBD and Wood in public ownership. The planting of native species has been happening progressively. A well-used track has been provided, linking the Centre of NZ with Walter’s Bluff. Council now owns the majority of the Grampians, including a valuable native forest remnant on the southern slopes and has been replacing the pine and eucalyptus species with more appropriate ornamental exotic species and natives. The public reaction to the choice of exotic ornamentals indicated that there is considerable support for re-vegetating our hills with native species.  In the Marsden Valley, a combined programme with Council, schools and the community has been controlling old man’s beard and other weed pests and planting additional native trees in the reserve areas. Additional tracks are planned to cater for walkers, runners and mountain bikers, including providing further access to the Bryant Range. Over the past 30 years, Council has been actively acquiring land in the Maitai Valley and establishing a variety of recreational facilities, including the Maitai Walkway and Waahi Taakaro golf course. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust has been established and is working on implementing its vision for a fenced pest-free sanctuary in the forested headwaters of the Brook catchment where lost species, such as kiwi, saddleback and tuatara, will be able to be re-introduced. It is anticipated that the sanctuary will be a nursery for wildlife that will spread into the adjoining forested areas such as the Maitai Valley, Marsden Valley, Mount Richmond Forest Park and down the Brook Valley corridor into the central city. In August 2003, the Council and the Department of Conservation jointly published the booklet Living Heritage: Growing Native Plants in Nelson which describes eight different lowland ecosystems in the Nelson City area and provides advice on planting and lists of native species appropriate for each ecosystem. This publication is an excellent resource for residents, community groups and others interested in restoring the native vegetation that is unique to Nelson. In May 2007, Council adopted the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy after a collaborative preparation effort by a Council-led inter-agency working group involving more than 20 community organisation over the preceding 2 years, including wider public consultation. The strategy contains 8 principles for biodiversity management, a vision, goals, objectives, methods and priority actions, including the preparation of Biodiversity Action Plans to cover flats, freshwater, coast, sea and hills. The Biodiversity Forum at its most recent meeting on 30 March 2009 adopted 3 action plans for the terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. It is now a widely accepted principle in biodiversity and conservation reserve management that connected areas are better than unconnected areas and that larger reserves are better than smaller reserves and as a consequence the benefits of connecting reserve areas via wildlife corridors are now widely appreciated. Such corridors are general vegetated to at least some extent to enable the movement of wildlife, particularly birds, in relatively safety and with food sources along the way to help sustain them in journeys between larger areas of suitable habitat. In urban and peri-urban situations such corridors can be for multiple purposes eg they can contain tracks and other facilities for recreational users. In valleys, such corridors can also incorporate esplanade/riparian reserves/strips alongside rivers and streams. The Nelson Biodiversity Strategy included several references to this concept such as Priority Action 16. Connect large and small remnants of native vegetation where appropriate with corridors of replanting, focusing these along the course of streams and rivers and across the city. The VisionTo develop a strategy or policy that has a goals of vegetating with appropriate native and other species, the city backdrop and adjacent valleys and establishes multi-purpose corridors that help to achieve the biodiversity strategy and bring nature back into the urban areas.Preparation of a Re-vegetation and Corridor StrategySuch a strategy could build on what Council has been doing over recent years and provide a more integrated, considered and strategic approach then the present rather ad hoc approach. It could identify backdrop hills and valleys that could be re-vegetated with native and appropriate exotic species. It could also identify possible corridors to link areas of native vegetation. These could be mapped onto large scale aerial photographs. The strategy could in addition to covering land currently owned by Council also include other public lands, land protected by covenants and land that has significant conservation value or potential strategic and/or conservation value that Council or other public agencies may wish to acquire and/or protect. Priorities could be established to help determine Council work programmes, guide community planting projects and reserve acquisition. Council could involve other interested parties including the Biodiversity Forum and provide opportunities for public input. Such a strategy may provide reserve network information that could eventually be incorporated in the Nelson Resource Management Plan, perhaps via structure plans, and into other Council documents such as reserve management plans. BenefitsThese could include:Biodiversity – assisting with implementation of the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy -  enhanced natural values through additional areas of native vegetation and network of wildlife corridors;Community involvement and pride – huge potential to involve the community and to tap into the enthusiasm for planting native trees and shrubs and predator control projects – participants deriving personal satisfaction and community pride from their involvement and the work achieved;Recreation and healthy lifestyle – additional recreational opportunities;Nelson naturally brand – another clean & green element - enhanced backdrop to city and corridor network – a point of difference with other communities;Tourism – additional attractions and facilities for visitors;Employment and training – opportunities for pest control, plant propagation, planting, track development etc;Reduced fire risk – buffer between inflammable vegetation and city;Buffer between people and pollen from pines;Increased certainty with respect to long term planning goals;Substantial contribution to Council’s vision and community outcomes; andPossible opportunities for obtaining carbon credits for re-vegetated and enhanced areas. Recommendation That the Environment Committee consider this paper and, if supportive, set up a joint councillor and staff working group to prepare a draft re-vegetation and corridor strategy.  Derek Shaw
1045.1	Firstly, a big thank you to Council for the decision to undertake a review of its 600ha of plantation forestry holdings. Secondly, congratulations to the Right Tree Right Place Taskforce for the thorough and comprehensive review of the council’s forestry holdings. The information, assessments, observations and preferences contained in the various reports and the well-foundered, evidence-based and wide-ranging recommendations should provide a strong strategic basis for Council to proceed with a staged approach to implementing the taskforce’s recommendations. If the recommendations are adopted and implemented over time with extensive community involvement they should result in profound positive benefits on the management of the City’s eastern hinterland and restoration of indigneous biodiversity values and provide increased recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. This in turn should not only provide personal health and social benefits but also considerable long term financial benefits to the wider community and future generations. Council’s options for forestryIn terms of the two options proposed, I strongly support Option 2 – Council’s proposal to change the current approach through exiting commercial forestry over time and to grow a continuous canopy of mixed species and manage the Council land as one area. Related priorities and considerationsTo enable option 2 to proceed it is crucial to quickly prepare a next steps strategy and to allocate adequate funding in the LTP to address the recommendations in the report requiring immediate action (14 & 15), the transition planning and high priority areas for action (16-19). The need to urgently address current issues with invasive pest animals and plants mentioned in several places in the report and is the focus of recommendation 5, will also need to have adequate funding in all years of the LTP. Otherwise, the current biodiversity degradation will continue to increase and become an even more difficult challenge to get on top of. While supporting the concept of mixed forests and having introduced canopy trees in appropriate areas that maybe harvested at some stage in the future, the location of such areas and the species used need to be carefully considered. I note that the report indicates that the most likely locations for consideration of some continued planting of timber species  is some of the more accessible lower slopes in the Roding, which from my knowledge of the eastern hills I concur with. Such considerations include the impacts of providing ground access to such sites, impacts on waterways and establishment of adequate riparian margins, as well as ensuring that they do not contribute to additional wilding pines or other introduced species becoming future pest plants. I suggest that the ‘independent community entity’ included in recommendation 4 have in addition to tangata whenua also have a wide range of perspectives from the community including those with biodiversity expertise, and perhaps also involvement in the Nelson Biodiversity Forum. I also feel that recommendation 6 could be strengthened through the addition of “and biodiversity” after “climate” and in front of the last word “risks” so that it reads …. “and address climate and biodiversity risks”. As I mention in two paragraphs below it is widely accepted that we have a NZ and global biodiversity crisis (as well as a climate crisis). Other relevant considerationsWhile the report provides some background on previous discussions and reports on the development and impacts of forestry there have been significant changes in community attitudes and values as well as in council over the last 40 years or so that I believe are important for council and those who will be dealing with the implementation of the report to bear in mind. There has been increasing acknowledgement that NZ, and the rest of the world, is facing a biodiversity crisis with the loss of indigenous habitats particularly in lowland areas and the degradation of remaining areas through the spread of introduced browsing animals and the reduction in and loss of our special indigenous fauna. The conservation movement has largely moved from saving areas under threats of destruction to restoration of the biodiversity values over a wide range of habitats.  These concerns and the desire to restore degraded areas was a major driver in the establishment of the Nelson Biodiversity Forum and the resulting Biodiversity Strategies developed jointly by Council, the Department of Conservation and other government agencies along with a wide of concerned community organisations and companies. Many existing organisations, such as Forest and Bird and Friends of the Maitai, took the lead in various restoration projects. It was also the key driver for the establishment of the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust and the creation of a predator-free sanctuary in Council’s former water management reserve in the upper Brook Valley. Many trapping groups have been working hard in areas around the sanctuary and in the corridor down the Brook Valley to reduce the numbers of animal pests, such as stoats, possums, weasels and rats, that were killing large numbers of birds. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary and other conservation projects have shown that there is an “army of conservation volunteers” in our community who are very willing to regularly give their time and energy to enhancing the biodiversity values of our natural areas, including in riparian margins and the often quite rugged eastern hills. Such groups of volunteers have been co-ordinated and assisted by Council over many years now, including in projects under the umbrella of the Council’s Nelson Nature programme. The results from these efforts are now showing up not only when people visit the sanctuary and areas where pest trapping is occurring and supplementary planting is being undertaken, but also in residential areas adjoining the eastern hills with increased sightings of native bird species.     There is no reason why this voluntary army cannot be encouraged and increased to assist with the replanting of areas cleared of exotic forestry in the areas that are to be transitioned to native species. Many retirees are keen to contribute to such projects and many active walkers, runners and mountain bikers are also keen to give back to improve the areas they enjoy visiting and to expanding such areas. It may be useful for those planning the transition from exotic to native species to review the work that the Nelson Biodiversity Forum has undertaken, including the large-scale mapping of potential biodiversity corridors designed to link upland areas with lowland and coastal areas, to see how such retired forestry areas can be incorporated into and enhance such biodiversity corridors. It is pleasing to see that the taskforce report acknowledges that much of the forestry blocks in the Maitai, Marsden and Brook catchments are within the Nelson Nature Halo project around the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary. And in addition that the report contains observations and preferences that they be phased over to indigenous vegetation and provide increased habitat enhancement for birdlife from the sanctuary and additional opportunities for increased recreational activities close to urban areas. This fits very nicely with the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary vision of a biodiversity corridor down the Brook Valley and of improving the habitat outside of the predator-proof fence to enable wildlife that fly over or are relocated outside the fence to have a greater chance of successfully repopulating the adjacent areas of native forests. As a former member of the Forestry Committee during my second term as a councillor, I advocated for a wider range of plantation species, including macrocarpa and hardwood species, to provide a range of timbers that could provide a resource for local furniture and cabinet makers and other possible users of alternative species. However, the prevailing view at the time was that Council needed to focus on increasing the area of Council’s “commercial” exotic forestry plantations to a so-called “sustainable” area of 800ha and continue planting Pinus radiata (as that was what everybody else was planting). This situation was not entirely surprising as the chair of the committee then was the recently retired former NZ Forest Service Conservator of Forests for the Nelson Marlborough area. One of the consequences of this desire to increase the area in plantation forestry was the establishment of some areas of pine plantations in small isolated pockets (particularly in the Maitai catchment) with seemingly no consideration of how the trees would be harvested 25-30 years later and the potential adverse impacts from providing access tracks and the logging techniques on water and soil values. Pines were also planted upstream of Council’s Maitai water supply dam and intakes contrary to its own water supply catchment management practice and the generally accepted best practice throughout the country. So it is very pleasing to read in the taskforce report that such plantings are likely to be transitioned to natives and environmentally damaging practices of clear felling of quite large areas will cease. In 2009, as Chair of Council’s Environment Committee I reworked a discussion paper following encouragement from Mayor Marshall on revegetating the city’s hill backdrop and valleys and establishing corridors which built on a paper initially prepared six years earlier. It seemed to help with the Council purchase of additional land on the Grampians, Brook Valley and the ridge in between the Brook and Maitai valleys that contained the former Dun Mountain railway line that is now part of the popular Coppermine Trail – one of the 23 Great Rides of New Zealand. It was however rather disappointing to see that after the pines were harvested that it was mostly replanted in another crop of pines. The paper is included below for anyone who is interested in reading it. 28 April 2009 The Chairperson and CouncillorsEnvironment Committee VEGETATING THE CITY HILL BACKDROP AND VALLEYS AND ESTABLISHING CORRIDORS Reason for the PaperTo suggest the preparation of a strategy for the re-vegetation of the city’s backdrop hills and valleys and the establishment of multi-purpose corridors. BackgroundOver the past decade or so, Council has been actively re-vegetating some of the hills that form the backdrop to the central city with native and other appropriate species. Areas on the Grampians, Centre of NZ and the Malvern Hills have been particularly targeted. Various individuals and community groups have assisted with this work. A network of tracks which have been popular with walkers, runners and mountain bikers has been established as part of the provision of recreational facilities available to residents and visitors. The western slopes of the Malvern Hills were purchased by Council with the express purpose of securing the backdrop to the CBD and Wood in public ownership. The planting of native species has been happening progressively. A well-used track has been provided, linking the Centre of NZ with Walter’s Bluff. Council now owns the majority of the Grampians, including a valuable native forest remnant on the southern slopes and has been replacing the pine and eucalyptus species with more appropriate ornamental exotic species and natives. The public reaction to the choice of exotic ornamentals indicated that there is considerable support for re-vegetating our hills with native species.  In the Marsden Valley, a combined programme with Council, schools and the community has been controlling old man’s beard and other weed pests and planting additional native trees in the reserve areas. Additional tracks are planned to cater for walkers, runners and mountain bikers, including providing further access to the Bryant Range. Over the past 30 years, Council has been actively acquiring land in the Maitai Valley and establishing a variety of recreational facilities, including the Maitai Walkway and Waahi Taakaro golf course. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust has been established and is working on implementing its vision for a fenced pest-free sanctuary in the forested headwaters of the Brook catchment where lost species, such as kiwi, saddleback and tuatara, will be able to be re-introduced. It is anticipated that the sanctuary will be a nursery for wildlife that will spread into the adjoining forested areas such as the Maitai Valley, Marsden Valley, Mount Richmond Forest Park and down the Brook Valley corridor into the central city. In August 2003, the Council and the Department of Conservation jointly published the booklet Living Heritage: Growing Native Plants in Nelson which describes eight different lowland ecosystems in the Nelson City area and provides advice on planting and lists of native species appropriate for each ecosystem. This publication is an excellent resource for residents, community groups and others interested in restoring the native vegetation that is unique to Nelson. In May 2007, Council adopted the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy after a collaborative preparation effort by a Council-led inter-agency working group involving more than 20 community organisation over the preceding 2 years, including wider public consultation. The strategy contains 8 principles for biodiversity management, a vision, goals, objectives, methods and priority actions, including the preparation of Biodiversity Action Plans to cover flats, freshwater, coast, sea and hills. The Biodiversity Forum at its most recent meeting on 30 March 2009 adopted 3 action plans for the terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. It is now a widely accepted principle in biodiversity and conservation reserve management that connected areas are better than unconnected areas and that larger reserves are better than smaller reserves and as a consequence the benefits of connecting reserve areas via wildlife corridors are now widely appreciated. Such corridors are general vegetated to at least some extent to enable the movement of wildlife, particularly birds, in relatively safety and with food sources along the way to help sustain them in journeys between larger areas of suitable habitat. In urban and peri-urban situations such corridors can be for multiple purposes eg they can contain tracks and other facilities for recreational users. In valleys, such corridors can also incorporate esplanade/riparian reserves/strips alongside rivers and streams. The Nelson Biodiversity Strategy included several references to this concept such as Priority Action 16. Connect large and small remnants of native vegetation where appropriate with corridors of replanting, focusing these along the course of streams and rivers and across the city. The VisionTo develop a strategy or policy that has a goals of vegetating with appropriate native and other species, the city backdrop and adjacent valleys and establishes multi-purpose corridors that help to achieve the biodiversity strategy and bring nature back into the urban areas.Preparation of a Re-vegetation and Corridor StrategySuch a strategy could build on what Council has been doing over recent years and provide a more integrated, considered and strategic approach then the present rather ad hoc approach. It could identify backdrop hills and valleys that could be re-vegetated with native and appropriate exotic species. It could also identify possible corridors to link areas of native vegetation. These could be mapped onto large scale aerial photographs. The strategy could in addition to covering land currently owned by Council also include other public lands, land protected by covenants and land that has significant conservation value or potential strategic and/or conservation value that Council or other public agencies may wish to acquire and/or protect. Priorities could be established to help determine Council work programmes, guide community planting projects and reserve acquisition. Council could involve other interested parties including the Biodiversity Forum and provide opportunities for public input. Such a strategy may provide reserve network information that could eventually be incorporated in the Nelson Resource Management Plan, perhaps via structure plans, and into other Council documents such as reserve management plans. BenefitsThese could include:Biodiversity – assisting with implementation of the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy -  enhanced natural values through additional areas of native vegetation and network of wildlife corridors;Community involvement and pride – huge potential to involve the community and to tap into the enthusiasm for planting native trees and shrubs and predator control projects – participants deriving personal satisfaction and community pride from their involvement and the work achieved;Recreation and healthy lifestyle – additional recreational opportunities;Nelson naturally brand – another clean & green element - enhanced backdrop to city and corridor network – a point of difference with other communities;Tourism – additional attractions and facilities for visitors;Employment and training – opportunities for pest control, plant propagation, planting, track development etc;Reduced fire risk – buffer between inflammable vegetation and city;Buffer between people and pollen from pines;Increased certainty with respect to long term planning goals;Substantial contribution to Council’s vision and community outcomes; andPossible opportunities for obtaining carbon credits for re-vegetated and enhanced areas. Recommendation That the Environment Committee consider this paper and, if supportive, set up a joint councillor and staff working group to prepare a draft re-vegetation and corridor strategy.  Derek Shaw
1089.3	It will be great to have native forests reclaiming the land. But weed control will be a real problem in the early years.
1121.1	Prefer higher percentage of native species
1124.3	Commercial forestry provides short term financial gain at high environmental costs that ultimately are costing the ratepayer - extraction erosion / lack of biodiversity / wilding pines issue. The forestry above Richmond / Stoke should, IMHO be replaced with mixed native and multiple access routes remain open (and be maintained by Council)  to the public for recreational purposes. Barnicoat / Glider Road is a classic example requiring on-going maintenance to allow multiple recreational uses currently being enjoyed to be continued. Mountain bike clubs, Paragliding and Hangliding clubs, walkers and runners heavily use the reserve areas and this needs to be maintained. With respect to paragliding and Hangliding Barnicoat is perhaps the most important readily accessible site in the region for these internationally growing activities. Any forestry activities need to understand the requirement to maintain / improve the launch site and access road and when planting new trees not to adversely impact launch and landing sites.Additional access routes eg. Silvan Road plus direct access walking / mountain biking routes from a secured 'bomb-out' at the foot of Barnicoat should also be sought to allow direct walk up hill / fly back to vehicle as is common throughout Europe. Any development at the base of the hill should take this into consideration as this will be a valuable asset for the region in respect of tourist income.
1148.1	I think pine trees are damaging to the waterways and also contribute to hayfever, so I would like to see a transition away from pine trees. I would birds to be taken into account when planting the mixed species canopy, so that food sources are available for them and nesting sites for ruru etc. Once the halo effect starts to take place from the sanctuary, the birds will need food, so I would like to see a lot of native trees as part of the mixed species canopy.
1216.3	We have lost a valuable scallop fishery in Tasman Bay through sedimentation smothering shellfish habitat, most of the sediment resulting from forest harvesting. Forestry harvesting practices in NZ are archaic by international standards resulting in widespread erosion with land and water degradation. Cr Sanson has shown the the economic benefits are marginal.Please exit commercial forestry and find an environmentally sound use for these lands. Plant a mixed canopy forest with recreation facilities like mountain bike and motor bike tracks and charge for use. Nelsons first multi use regional park?
1217.2	It would be great to see the growth of more native species in the area.
1236.2	Fully support the proposal to grow a continuous canopy.  Please do it in Kaka Valley as well.
1246.3	I strongly support ending Council's involvement in commercial forestry and wherever possible reverting all Council owned exotic forests to native forests. This would strongly benefit the environment and biodiversity in the Nelson region with associated amenity and economic benefits. It would also serve as a model for other local private exotic forest owners and could inspire them to revert more of their land to native plantings. The topography and geology of much of the forestry land near Nelson, combined with the clear-felling harvest practices, has resulted in unacceptable land erosion and sediment discharge to our rivers and to Tasman Bay. NCC should lead the way to reducing these negative environmental impacts by exiting its involvement with commercial forestry.
1260.2	Forest owners should be made to eradicate the wildering pine trees caused by their planting and forests.
1263.2	Forestry is damaging our coastal ecology the way it is managed in NZ - the silt loads are next level and forestry is a major contributor to this. Restoring council (public) land and reducing the disturbance / impact to ecology and recreation is a win-win.
1273.3	Like Option two but ensure to grow Native Forest only
1305.3	Great idea from lots of point of view (and especially a flood mitigation point of view). I also look across the Cook Strait and see the amazing work Wellington has done to enhance their native bird populations, using the halo effect of Zealandia (and trapping). We have our own Waimarama sanctuary and if we provide good habitat by converting the pine plantations and implement the 2022 Urban Greening Plan, we might be able to create an amazing city of native birds. These are the kind of treasures that will become more valuable with time.
1332.3	NZ Forestry practices are causing high rates of damage through sedimentation and slash, and here in Nelson‘s Tasman Bay have already destroyed shellfish habitat. In addition it is not even commercially lucrative.
1348.3	It is crucial Nelson moves away from single species pine forestry as it a major player in recent environmental degradation. A continuous canopy of mixed species would prevent slips, protecting houses and roads, saving the council more money in the long term. It would also increase the amount of native bush in Nelson Tasman, increasing biodiversity of both plants and animals.
1350.1	This would be hugely more effective in supporting the environment and biodiversity, reduce silt run off into waterways, and provide better stability for the land.
1397.2	NCC have the opportunity to lead by example, by transitioning away from pine monoculture in the Maitai Valley. Pine forestry practices in the Maitai have been demonstrated to adversely impact the Maitai River and Nelson Haven, e.g. through sedimentation and associated toxic algal blooms, and slash washout during flood events. These adverse effects should be factored into the cost/benefit analysis when considering a transition away from pine forestry in the catchment.
1413.2	This is a great idea. Preferably native species all along the hills from Fringe Hill to Sylvan forest. The existing road infrastructure is important for the paragliding and hang gliding club to access the Barnicoat take off site, so hopefully any logging of existing pinus radiata would not adversely affect access.
1433.3	Council’s forestry approachTBCA supports Option 2 – change our approach, exit commercial forestry over time and grow a continuous canopy of mixed species Nelson’s backdrop of low, north-facing hills provides a wonderful opportunity for development as a recreational space with high conservation and biodiversity values. A mix of native and exotic tree species would give stable forest cover while also reducing the risk of sedimentation, which is an inevitable feature of plantation forestry.
1466.3	Recent weather events throughout New Zealand have proven that large scale forestry can be very damaging to our environment and the environment.With the fickle market nature of Pine logs, it is also demonstrated that commercial forestry would bring little to no benefit to NCC managed land.Moving away from short rotation pine crops and re-establishing native species will help support our waterways and coastline recovery.